The Scotland Case
Is This An Erroneous Identification?
![]()
What do you think?
The correct answer has been acknowledged.
The experts concluded that the latent mark is not that of Shirley McKie.
The Minister for Justice, Mr. Jim Wallace, made an emergency statement in the Scottish Parliament today.
The Lord Advocate went further in saying that all future 'idents' to the prosecution in Scotland by SCRO will be subject to independent verification by a bureau outwith SCRO. Thursday, 22 June 2000
For more
information on the Shirley McKie case visit:
http://onin.com/fp
The page
will load slowly as a result of the resolution needed to display the
images.
For a closer look at any of the prints click on the photos.
(Each of those images is rather large, please be patient -- 150 to
400k file sizes)
TECHNICAL NOTE:
The images above were scanned from approximately 3 x 5 inch
photographs. Those photographs depicted the original exhibits used
by the prosecution. The artifact (vertical sectioning) visible in
the lower right image, was present in the photograph used for
scanning. The original charting was performed digitally and the
artifact was apparently created in that process.
The single image above was scanned from a photograph taken by one of the defense experts approximately two years after the initial investigation. A slight brush mark across the latent was apparent when the photograph was taken.
The two images above were scanned from original inked prints.
![]()
By opening two windows containing different
enlarged images,
an on-screen comparison can be initiated.










